Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmptD0LoY/Ex2_Luc02a

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
MARK(terms(X)) → TERMS(mark(X))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → S(N)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → RECIP(sqr(N))
TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → DBL(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → TERMS(s(N))
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → S(dbl(X))
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → S(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(0)) → MARK(0)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → SQR(N)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sqr(0)) → MARK(0)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → DBL(mark(X))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → S(s(dbl(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → RECIP(mark(X))
ACTIVE(first(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → ADD(sqr(X), dbl(X))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → CONS(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → SQR(mark(X))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → DBL(X)
RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → SQR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
MARK(terms(X)) → TERMS(mark(X))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → S(N)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → RECIP(sqr(N))
TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → DBL(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → TERMS(s(N))
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → S(dbl(X))
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → S(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(0)) → MARK(0)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → SQR(N)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(sqr(0)) → MARK(0)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → DBL(mark(X))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → S(s(dbl(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → RECIP(mark(X))
ACTIVE(first(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → ADD(sqr(X), dbl(X))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → CONS(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → SQR(mark(X))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → DBL(X)
RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → SQR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 9 SCCs with 29 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(active(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(dbl(x₁)) = 1
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(recip(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(sqr(x₁)) = 1
POL(terms(x₁)) = 1

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
first(x1, x2) = first(x1, x2)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = x1
sqr(x1) = sqr(x1)
add(x1, x2) = add(x1, x2)
dbl(x1) = dbl(x1)
recip(x1) = x1
terms(x1) = terms(x1)
mark(x1) = x1
0 = 0
active(x1) = x1
nil = nil

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK₁, first₂, ACTIVE₁, sqr₁, dbl₁, terms₁] > add₂ > s₁
[MARK₁, first₂, ACTIVE₁, sqr₁, dbl₁, terms₁] > [0, nil]

Status:

add₂: multiset
MARK₁: [1]
sqr₁: [1]
dbl₁: [1]
s₁: multiset
first₂: multiset
0: multiset
ACTIVE₁: [1]
terms₁: [1]
nil: multiset

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
mark(0) → active(0)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(dbl(x₁)) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(recip(x₁)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(sqr(x₁)) = 0
POL(terms(x₁)) = 1

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(dbl(x₁)) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(recip(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(sqr(x₁)) = 0
POL(terms(x₁)) = 1

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1